Task 1
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Gross Profit Margin Ratio
Gross profit/Net sales *100
2019 = 332,493 / 538,855 * 100
= 61.7%
2020 = 467031/801524 * 100
= 58.27%
Operating Profit Margin Ratio
= operating Profit/Net sales *100
2019 = 99,565/538,855 * 100
= 15.2%
2020 = 148891/801524 * 100
=7.01%
Net Profit Margin Ratio
= Net income/net sales * 100
2019 = 57663/538855
=10.7%
2020 = 8879/801524
=1.11%
Return on Assets (ROA)
= Net income/Net assest
2019 – 57,633/442,062
=0.13
2020 – 8,879/779,202
=0.01
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
ROCE = Earnings Before Interest and Tax/ (Total assets -Current liability)
2019- 84,293/(594,553 – 81,131)
=0.164
2020 – 45,864/ (1,573,432 – 236,751)
=0.034
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE = Net income/ Shareholders equity
2019- 84,293/442,062
=0.191
2020 – 45,864/779,202
= 0.059
2. Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio
= Current assets /Current liabilities
2019= 148,173/81,131
=1.826
2020 = 538,189/236,751
=2.273
Quick Ratio
= (Current assets- inventory) /Current liabilities
2019= (148,173-122,773-)/81,131
=0.313
2020 = (538,189-228,793)/236,751
=1.307
Cash Ratio
(Current assets- inventory-Receivables) /Current liabilities
2019= (148,173-122,773-14,206)/81,131
=0.138
2020 = (538,189-228,793-73,668)/236,751
=0.996
Efficiency Ratios
-
Accounts Receivable Turnover
Net Credit sales/Average accounts receivables
Net credit sales= sales -cash sales – sales returns.
2019= (538,855- 6,230)/14,206
= 37.49
2020= (801,524-231,885)/73,668
= 7.73
-
Accounts Payable Turnover
Purchases/ Total accounts payables.
2019=332,493/74,560
=4.46
2020=467,031/143,698
=3.25
-
Asset Turnover Ratio
Sales/Average total sales
2019=538,855/594,553
=0.91
2020=801,524/ 1,573,432
=0.51
-
Capital Turnover Ratio
Sales/average capital employed
2019=538,855/ (594,553-81,131)
=1.05
2020=801,524/ (1,573,432-236,751)
=0.6
-
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Cost of goods sold/average inventory
2019=332,493/122,773
=2.71
2020 = 467,031/ 228,793
=2.04
-
Working Capital Turnover Ratio
Sales/ Working capital
2019=538,855/ (148,173-81,131)
=8.04
2020=801,524 / (538,189 -236,751)
=2.66
Solvency Ratios
-
Debt Ratio
Liability/assets
2019=152,491/594,553
=0.26
2020=794,230 /1,573,432
=0.504
-
Equity Ratio
Shareholder’s equity/total assets
2019=57,633/594,553
=0.097
2020=8,879 / 1,573,432
=0.006
-
Debt to Equity Ratio
Total debt/ Equity
2019=152,491/57,633
=2.65
2020=794,230 /8,879
=89.45
-
Interest Coverage Ratio
EBIT/Interest expense
2019 =84,293/25,500
=3.31
2020 = 45,864/ 241,270
=0.19
3. These three options would require an initial expenditure of (A) £650,000, (B) £1,100,000, or (C) £1,800,000.
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
£’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
|
300 | 400 | 450 | 500 |
|
500 | 550 | 700 | 950 |
|
500 | 800 | 1050 | 1200 |
BUSINESS REPORT
The business report will comprise of three projects A, B, and C. The three projects will be evaluated based on their Net Present Value. The projects will later be ranked in order starting from the project with the highest NPV. The projects will be performed based on rank with projects with higher Net present values being performed first.
Project A
Investment =650,000
Cost of capital =6%
n = 4
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment | -650,000 | ||||||
Annual cash flows | 300,000 | 400,000 | 450,000 | 500000 | |||
Capital allowance (20%) | -130,000 | -130,000 | -130,000 | -130,000 | |||
Taxable Profit | 170,000 | 270,000 | 320,000 | 370,000 | |||
Corporation tax (25%) | -42,500 | -67,500 | -80,000 | -92,500 | |||
Profit after Tax | 127,500 | 202,500 | 240,000 | 277,500 | |||
Add back Capital allowance | 130,000 | 130,000 | 130,000 | 130,000 | |||
Actual annual Cash flows | -650,000 | 257,500 | 332,500 | 370,000 | 407,500 | ||
PVIF (6%) W 1. | 1 | 0.9434 | 0.89 | 0.8396 | 0.7921 | ||
Present Value | -650,000 | 242,926 | 295,925 | 310,652 | 322,781 | ||
Net Present Value | 522,283 | ||||||
Working 1 | |||||||
(1+ (1+r)^n | 1+1.06^n | ||||||
Year 0 | 1 | ||||||
Year 1 | 0.943396 | ||||||
Year 2 | 0.889996 | ||||||
Year 3 | 0.839619 | ||||||
Year 4 | 0.792094 | ||||||
Working 2 | |||||||
NPV= | NPV = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+…….+ CFn/(1+r)^n | ||||||
Npv = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+ CF2/(1+r)^2+CF3/(1+r)^3+CF4/(1+r)^4 |
Project B
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment | -1,100,000 | ||||
Annual cash flows | 500,000 | 550,000 | 700,000 | 950,000 | |
Capital allowance (20%) | -220,000 | -220,000 | -220,000 | -220,000 | |
Taxable Profit | 280,000 | 330,000 | 480,000 | 730,000 | |
Corporation tax (25%) | -70000 | -82500 | -120000 | -182500 | |
Profit after Tax | 210,000 | 247,500 | 360,000 | 547,500 | |
Add back Capital allowance | 220,000 | 220,000 | 220,000 | 220,000 | |
Actual annual Cash flows | -1,100,000 | 430,000 | 467,500 | 580,000 | 767,500 |
PVIF (6%) | 1 | 0.9434 | 0.89 | 0.8396 | 0.7921 |
Present Value | -1100000 | 405662 | 416075 | 486968 | 607936.8 |
Net Present Value | 816641.8 |
Working 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
(1+ (1+r)^n | 1+1.06^n | |||
Year 0 | 1 | |||
Year 1 | 1.106 | |||
Year 2 | 1.223236 | |||
Year 3 | 1.352899016 | |||
Year 4 | 1.496306312 | |||
Working 2 | ||||
NPV = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+…….+ CFn/(1+r)^n | ||||
Npv = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+ CF2/(1+r)^2+CF3/(1+r)^3+CF4/(1+r)^4 | ||||
Year 0 | -1100000 | |||
Year 1 | 430000*0.9434 | |||
Year 2 | 416075*0.89 | |||
Year 3 | 486968*0.8396 | |||
Year 4 | 607936*0.7921 | |||
Total NPV = | 816641.75 |
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment | -1800000 | ||||
Annual cash flows | 500,000 | 800,000 | 1,050,000 | 1,200,000 | |
Capital allowance (20%) | -360,000 | -360,000 | -360,000 | -360,000 | |
Taxable Profit | 140,000 | 440,000 | 690,000 | 840,000 | |
Corporation tax (25%) | -35000 | -110000 | -172500 | -210000 | |
Profit after Tax | 105,000 | 330,000 | 517,500 | 630,000 | |
Add back Capital allowance | 360000 | 360000 | 360000 | 360000 | |
Actual annual Cash flows | -1800000 | 465,000 | 690,000 | 877,500 | 990,000 |
PVIF (6%) | 1 | 0.9434 | 0.89 | 0.8396 | 0.7921 |
Present Value | -1800000 | 438681 | 614100 | 736749 | 784179 |
Net Present Value | 773709 |
Working 1 | ||
---|---|---|
(1+ (1+r)^n | 1+1.06^n | |
Year 0 | 1 | |
Year 1 | 0.943396226 | |
Year 2 | 0.88999644 | |
Year 3 | 0.839619283 | |
Year 4 | 0.792093663 | |
Working 2 | ||
NPV = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+…….+ CFn/(1+r)^n | ||
Npv = CF0/(1+r)^0+ CF1/(1+r)^1+ CF2/(1+r)^2+CF3/(1+r)^3+CF4/(1+r)^4 | ||
Year 0 | -1800000 | |
Year 1 | 0.9434*465,000 | |
Year 2 | 0.89*690,000 | |
Year 3 | 0.8396*877,500 | |
Year 4 | 0.7921*990,000 | |
Total NPV | 773709 |
Decision: Project B has the highest NPV of 816641.75 and should thereby be preferred and selected. The NPV is higher as compared to project C which has an NPV of 773,709 and project A which has NPV of 522,283.
b)
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual cash flows | -1,100,000 | 430,000 | 467,500 | 580,000 | 767,500 |
PVIF (35 %) | 1 | 0.7407 | 0.5487 | 0.4064 | 0.3011 |
Present Value | -1100000 | 318501 | 256517.3 | 235712 | 231094.3 |
Net Present Value | -58175.5 | ||||
IRR= Linear interpolation method
∑1/(1+r)t*[B-C]=0
=Using 35% rate since it gives a negative NPV.
IRR = r1+PV1$frac{r2 – r1}{PV1 + PV2}$
Where r1=6%
r2=35%/
PV1= 816,641.75
PV2= -58,175.5
= 6% + (816,641.75[(35%-6%) / (816,641.75 + 58,175.5)]
= 6% + 27.071%
= 33.071%
Decision: Accept investment project since 33.071% (IRR)>6% (predetermined discount rate)
c) Interpret results
i)
Net Present Value (NPV) is equal to the sum of the present value of all the cash flows associated with a project. It is a time discounted technique that takes into account the time value of money. The NPV of simple projects decrease with an increase in the discount rate. In decision making, a manager should only accept projects that are non negative or those that yield the highest NPV after ranking projects. In the presence of capital rationing, it is necessary to normalize projects so that they are comparable. This is crucial in ensuring that projects that yield the highest NPV are first undertaken.
NPV is the most preferred time discounting technique since;
-
It recognizes time value of money.
-
Considers all cash flows over the entire life of the project.
-
Ease to compare projects.
-
The NPV of various projects can be added. This ensures that a negative NPV project will not be accepted just because it is combined with positive NPVproject. since NPV (A + B) =NPV (A) + NPV (B)
ii)
Many researchers prefer non-time discounted techniques for project evaluation. Non-time adjusted investment criteria consider benefits and costs as they are in each period. Non-time adjusted investment criteria include urgency, payback period, and ROI (or accounting rate of return) (ARR). Projects that are deemed to be urgent take precedence over projects that are deemed to be less urgent. A project with a shorter payback period is preferred. The higher the accounting rate of return, the more successful the project. In non-discounted techniques, profits can be calculated in relation to the amount of money spent, and the profitability index can be used to equate return on capital with the project’s Weighted Average Cost Capital. A greater index above 1 usually indicates project approval, so this is a simpler decision-making criterion. Most decision makers prefer the non-discounted technique since it is easier to compute and infer as compared to the discounted techniques. It is also a better measure of project risk in current periods and in smaller sized projects.
iii)
There are numerous factors that a manager should consider before undertaking a project. The three major factors affecting a project are; time, cost and quality. These factors could be subdivided into quantitative and qualitative aspects. The quantitative aspects refer to material aspects such as investment capital and levels of return. These quantitative aspects are further determined by calculating expected rates of return and incorporating the project risk. A decision maker makes his decision based on the expected levels of return and the risk associated with the project. The decision makers appetite to risk is a crucial determiner to the choice of investment to undertake. There are also qualitative aspects of a project that require to be considered. They include; vision, superstition, politics, intuition, sponsorship, intangible benefits. These factors are fundamental in ensuring the project meets various specifications. The cost of a project is measured using a capital budget. A decision maker should pay close attention to ensure the project meets the three criteria and that it is feasible.
d)
Project Ranking | Totalcapital available | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project Name (priority) | B | C | A | |
NPV | 816,641.75 | 773,709 | 522,283.25 | |
Investment allocation | 2,500,000 | 1,100,000 | 1,400,000 | 0 |
Total NPV | 792599.41 | 359322.4 | 433277 | 0 |
Since there is a capital constraint, projects are ranked based on their NPV. Project B is prioritized since it yields the highest NPV. After having been undertaken, only project C and A remain. Based on NPV, project C is preferred to project A and part of it is undertaken based on the capital available. Project A is not undertaken since there is capital shortage.
e) Recommendations
I would highly recommend that you consider undertaking the projects in order of Project B, Project C and finally Project A. Based on empirical findings, I determined that project b will have the highest Net Present Value as compared to the rest of the projects. The other projects will be considered in the future in the order B, C, and A. Capital is a crucial determiner for undertaking the above projects. I thereby proposed three financing sources along with their merits and demerits which could be a crucial source of finance for the project. These sources are; debt capital, retained earnings and equity capital.
-
Debt capital.
The company could choose to either secure a bank loan or issue debt to the public. In public debt issue, they could use public securities such ass promissory notes or through corporate bonds. By issuing securities in exchange for cash, Greenfield company will be in a position to invest money in the projects and payback the debtors the principal amount plus the accrued interest levels.
Merits
Tax advantages. The amount paid in interest is tax deductible and effectively reduces your net liability.
Control is retained. When you accept debt funding from a lending institution, the borrower has no say in how you run your business. You’re taking all of the options. The partnership will end once you have paid off the loan in full.
Facilitates planning. You know exactly how much capital and interest you will pay each month. As a result, the budget and financial arrangements are easier to create.
Demerits
Requirements for qualification. To get loans, you’ll need a decent credit score.
Collateral. By committing to offer leverage to the lender, you could be putting some of your company’s assets at risk. It’s also possible that you’ll be asked to directly guarantee the loan, putting your own assets at risk.
Equity Capital
The company could choose to raise capital by offering the capitals stake in the business in exchange for cash. The investors will thereby become shareholders in the business and will be entitled to receiving dividends. Since this mode of public equity issuing dilutes the company’s ownership, the company could choose to use private equity financing. In this private financing, only members are expected to purchase shares and thereby providing capital to undertake the projects without substantially affecting the ownership.
Merits
Less burden to the company. Therefore, more money could be reinvested to grow the company and undertake the successive projects (C and A)
Build partnerships. The business could benefit from gaining more experienced partners that will steer forward the company to prosperity.
Demerits
Loss of control. Once there is a significant or major shareholder, there will be a loss of partial control.
Share profits. Once there is an additional shareholder, the company’s owners will have to share the available profits before the projects begin to bear fruits.
Retained earnings
Greenfield company could choose to increase its profits to ensure that it retains as much profits as possible. Rather than sharing the increased profits as dividends to shareholders, the company could choose to reinvest the money to perform the projects.
Merits
-
There is increased access to urgency funds to conduct the prioritized projects incase of a shortage.
-
Eliminates the loss incurred by underpricing emanating from issuing of equity.
Demerits
-
Over capitalization
-
Reduced dividends to the shareholders.
Based on the findings, I would recommend that Greenfield company makes use of equity since it is a better method of financing deficit. The advantages emanating from equity financing are immense and could immensely help to steer the company forward to future profitability and increased market dominance.
Appendix
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended 31 July 2020
Section | 2020 | 2019 | |
NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 | ||
|
2.2 | 801,524 | 538,855 |
|
(334,493) | (206,362) | |
|
467,031 | 332,493) | |
|
2.2 | 27,369 | 1,130) |
|
2.2 | (169,272) | (160,581) |
|
2.2 | (176,237) | (73,477) |
(318,140) | (232,928) | ||
|
148,891 | 99,565) | |
|
3.2-3.4 | (103,027) | (15,272) |
|
45,864 | 84,293 | |
|
449 | 37) | |
|
(23,803) | (2,952) | |
|
4.1.1 | (23,354) | (2,915) |
|
22,510 | 81,378) | |
|
2.3 | (13,631) | (23,745) |
|
8,879 | 57,633) | |
|
|||
|
8,145 | 57,633) | |
|
734 | -) |
Other comprehensive income/(expense) that may be recycled through profit or loss:
|
4.3.2 | (9,259) | 620) |
|
4.3.2 | 259 | (3,297) |
|
4.3.2 | (61) | -) |
|
(9,061) | (2,677) | |
|
(182) | 54,956) | |
|
|||
|
(920) | 54,956) | |
|
738 | -) | |
|
2.4 | 1.7cps | 16.0cps) |
|
2.4 | 1.6cps | 15.9cps) |
|
2.4 | 493,347 | 359,600) |
|
2.4 | 494,582 | 361,566 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at 31 July 2020
Section | 2020 | 2019 | |
NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 | ||
|
|||
|
|||
|
3.1.2 | 231,885 | 6,230 |
|
3.1.3 | 73,668 | 14,206 |
|
3.1.1 | 228,793 | 122,773 |
|
4.2 | 53 | 4,964 |
|
3,790 | – | |
|
538,189 | 148,173 | |
|
|||
|
3.1.3 | 3,945 | – |
|
3.2 | 90,722 | 60,319 |
|
3.3 | 682,578 | 386,061 |
|
3.4.1 | 257,998 | – |
|
1,035,243 | 446,380 | |
|
1,573,432 | 594,553 | |
|
|||
|
|||
|
3.1.5 | 143,698 | 74,560 |
|
4.1 | – | – |
|
4.2 | 7,414 | 113 |
|
8,060 | 6,458 | |
|
3.4.2 | 77,579 | – |
|
236,751 | 81,131 | |
|
|||
|
4.2 | – | 9 |
|
3.1.5 | 14,413 | – |
|
4.1 | 241,270 | 25,500 |
|
2.3 | 81,452 | 45,851 |
|
3.4.2 | 220,344 | – |
|
557,479 | 71,360 | |
|
794,230 | 152,491 | |
|
779,202 | 442,062 | |
|
|||
|
4.3.1 | 626,380 | 251,113 |
|
4.3.2 | (16,611) | (6,171) |
|
165,426 | 197,120 | |
|
4,007 | – | |
|
779,202 | 442,062 |
Consolidated Statement
of Changes in Equity
For the Year Ended 31 July 2020
Cash | Foreign | Share | ||||||
Flow | Currency | Based | Non- | |||||
Share | Hedge | Translation | Payments | Other | Retained | controlling | Total | |
Capital | Reserve | Reserve | Reserve | Reserves | Earnings | Interest | Equity | |
NZ$’000 NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 NZ$’000 NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 | NZ$’000 | ||||
|
249,882 | 3,498 | (8,975) | 2,760 | – | 173,356 | – | 420,521 |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 57,633 | – | 57,633 |
|
– | 620 | (3,297) | – | – | – | – | (2,677) |
|
– | – | – | – | – | (33,883) | – | (33,883) |
|
1,231 | – | – | (1,231) | – | – | – | – |
|
– | – | – | 721 | – | – | – | 721 |
|
– | – | – | (14) | – | 14 | – | – |
|
– | – | – | (253) | – | – | – | (253) |
|
||||||||
|
251,113 | 4,118 | (12,272) | 1,983 | – | 197,120 | – | 442,062 |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 8,145 | 734 | 8,879 |
|
– | (9,259) | 255 | – | (61) | – | 4 | (9,061) |
|
– | – | – | – | – | (27,209) | – | (27,209) |
|
375,267 | – | – | (1,666) | – | – | – | 373,601 |
|
– | – | – | 378 | – | – | – | 378 |
|
– | – | – | (87) | – | – | – | (87) |
|
||||||||
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | 3,335 | 3,335 |
|
||||||||
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | (66) | (66) |
|
||||||||
|
– | – | – | – | – | (12,630) | – | (12,630) |
|
626,380 | (5,141) | (12,017) | 608 | (61) | 165,426 | 4,007 | 779,202 |